Solid
Surface worktops are a man-made
material consisting of mineral dust (mostly marble) mixed with a variety of
plastic resins and pigments. Its main appeal is that it is easy to fabricate
and can create completely seamless countertops, unlike any other countertop
surface. It was introduced in 1967 by DuPont under the brand name Corian,
though there are now other major brand names offering the material, including Minerva, Mirostone and Mistral. It is a decided improvement over laminate countertops,
and over the older plastic material commonly called cultured stone.
While solid-surface materials
mimic the look of stone--thanks to the fact that includes mineral dust--no one
is likely to mistake it for solid granite countertops. For many people, the
look of slab granite simply can't be duplicated or beat.
But recent years have seen the
introduction of Quartz worktops. Most of these are engineered stone products,
consisting of about 95% ground natural quartz and other materials with 5%
binding resins. It's here that there is a serious competition with
solid-surface materials. Both materials occupy the middle tier of worktop
options, falling between granite at the high end and plastic laminates at the
low end.
Following is a comparison
between these two excellent countertop choices on seven different
criteria:
· Composition
· DIY Installation
· Heat Resistance
· Seam Visibility
· Scratch Resistance
· Sealing Needs
· Cost
· Composition
· Neither of
these worktop choices is a "single substance" surface and
neither are all-natural. Both are aggregates of polymers and minerals. If a
purely natural product is somehow important to you, then natural stone slabs
are your only option.
· Solid
Surface: Corian, the original solid surface counter, is made of about 33%
acrylic resin (PMMA) and about 66% natural minerals. A bauxite derivative,
Aluminium Trihydrate (ATH), is the most common mineral. But if you're imagining
something like that looks like granite particles, you're wrong. ATH is a fine,
white powder, much like baking soda. The many different colours and styles are
achieved by different mixtures of pigments and mineral dust.
· Quartz: These
countertops include 5% to 10% binding resins, either polymeric or cement-based.
The other 90% to 95% is composed of hard, stone-like industrial waste products,
such as marble, quartz, glass, mirrors, etc. Some companies have even
begun to use non-food quality vegetable oils as one ingredient in the resins.
· Winner: If
naturalness is the goal, Quartz worktops win, but not by much.
Do-It-Yourself
Installation
Solid Surface and
Quartz: Difficult for the DIYer to obtain source materials because they
are basically locked down in a distribution/installation system of retailers,
fabricators, and installers.
In the case of solid-surface
materials, this is unfortunate, as the materials can be cut by ordinary power
saws and routers, and the seaming kits used to join pieces are not hard to use.
DIYers who managed to purchase the materials can be successful with solid
surface materials. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible for amateurs to
obtain sheets of solid-surface material.
Quartz, on the other hand,
requires special tools that most DIYers do not have. Even if you could buy the
sheets, it would be nearly impossible to work with them.
One option for DIY
installation is incidental pieces, such as ready-made, one-piece vanity unit
worktops.
Winner: Draw. Neither are
very amenable to DIY installation
Seam
Visibility
Solid Surface: Seams are
created with a bonding adhesive that creates such a tight seam that it is
nearly invisible to the naked eye.
Quartz: Seams are covered,
but visible.
Winner: Solid surface. As
large-slab products, though, both solid surface and quartz countertops will
have very few seams.
Scratch
Resistance
Solid Surface: Cutting
on solid surface countertops is not
recommended. It is guaranteed that
if you cut on Corian, scratches will appear. The good news is that
solid-surface materials can be rather easily sanded and buffed smooth
again--something you can't say for laminate countertops.
Quartz: While it
is recommended that you not cut on quartz/engineered stone surfaces, in
reality, they are difficult to scratch with normal use.
Winner: Finally, one clear
difference between the two. Quartz comes out ahead, by far.
Sealing
Needs
Solid Surface: None
required.
Quartz: None
required.
Winner: Draw. Both
are completely non-porous surfaces, so sealing is never required. The
amount of resins in the mix ensures non-porosity.
Cost
Solid Surface and Quartz:
Prices are can be virtually the same. The prices vary depending on the
style and color of the material selected. Prices are difficult to
compare because it is difficult-to-impossible to purchase the source
materials alone. Most suppliers will sell only to licensed fabricators or
contractors.
Winner: Draw
Additional
Factors
If a stone-like look/feel is
your intention, quartz/engineered counters would have some advantage over solid
surface.
If you want a
super-contemporary look, solid surface is the way to go. Solid surface can even
be thermoformed or worked by hand (like wood) into curvy, flowing shapes,
something you cannot say for quartz/engineered materials.
Corian weighs about 4.4 pounds
per square foot of 12 mm material; quartz weighs about 6.2 pounds for the same
size and thickness. Thus, quartz is about 1/3 heavier than Corian, which
translates to a slightly more solid feeling when installed. It is questionable
whether cooks would notice, or care about, this difference.